|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Feb 07, 2008 12:55 pm |
|
re: re: North Indians take pride in violating law: Delhi Lt Governor |
| Umesh Kulkarni
| |
Shalaka there is a definite mechanism for stopping dumping and it is a accepted thing in this civilised and free economy world. You talk of Chinese cheap goods, do you think someone can manufacture so cheap without the Government support and subsidy........... So even by your example its a fight between unequals (one who is supported by the Govt and one who is not). It's a different scene that the Indian Government doesnt have the will power and the time to devote for such causes.
My point is very simple, just like other fellow Indians have the right to go anywhere, Maharashtra goverment should have the right and God help the willingness to save its State brothers. NOTHING WRONG IN THAT. We all know when Chandra Babu was the Chief Minister and he was supporting the Central Government, how many favours he has got in his states favour, many times at the cost of other states. I dont remember any one raising a question at that time.
The US doesnt want Sovereign Funds to take over their important assets, the French Governemnt doesnt want SocGen (Bank) to be taken over by any non French. These and so many more examples we do see in this so called free economy world of your's and mine Shalaka. Call Centres are a double edged sword that the Americans invented to reduce their own costs and now their poeple compain about loosing jobs. In the garb of confidential information being leaked, you do see the US government trying to block this business from going out, not openly, but yes the Industry knows about it.
Shalaka, anyway in Mumbai, the educated class is fighting the battle against competition. I am talking about is the class below that who doeesn't even know what has hit them.
The point is clear, if you are drowning, you have every right to protect yourselves.
Violence was never the issue, I dont think any member here supports it. Why do you thank God for that??
ps:
1)Sincere thanks for your help. I have worked extensively in that area, got good contacts there, should any need arise.;;))
2) rebuttal is a form of evidence that is presented to contradict or nullify other evidence that has been presented by an adverse party (SO SAYS MY GOOGLE FISHING). We are neither here to nullify each others views nor are we adverse parties, atleast you will agree that S ;)
Private Reply to Umesh Kulkarni (new win) |
|
| |
|
