|
|
|
|
| The Bangalore Business Network Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts |
| Girls are nothing without man | Views: 1376 |
| Sep 15, 2005 11:15 am | | Girls are nothing without man | # |
Pradeep Mehta | |
WOMAN has MAN in it .
SHE has HE in it.
Mrs. has Mr. in it.
LADY has LAD in it.
MISTERESS has MISTER in it.
MADAM has ADAM in it.
HOSTESS has HOST in it.
FEMALE has MALE in it
and so on the list is never ending
SO NO need to be proud ....Girls
YOU are always incomplete without
Boys....ha ha ha
Enjoy Guys!!!!!
when gals can tell that the back of every sucessful guy there is women.
Then why gays cant tell Woman is not complete without Man
Regards,
PRadeep MEhtaPrivate Reply to Pradeep Mehta |
| Sep 15, 2005 11:23 am | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Tariq S P | | dude... you are in for a lot of stick on this..
all the best,
tariqPrivate Reply to Tariq S P |
| Sep 15, 2005 11:41 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Ram Mulage | | Wow really interesting one... Private Reply to Ram Mulage |
| Sep 15, 2005 12:02 pm | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Nandini K | | Hi Everyone, this guy isnt sure about other guys but he's defintely sure that GAYS can tell that a woman is complete without a man! Wow! How about asking some straight ones for a change? They may have a different opinion...what say? Private Reply to Nandini K |
| Sep 15, 2005 12:16 pm | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion | | Interrrrrrrrrrresting observation Nandini :)...Ok..opinion from the straight one...SHE needs HE in SHE for SHE to be SHE....:D
Pradeep...yaar bachpan ki yaad dila di...issi tarah ladkiyon ko chhed kar bhaag jaate tthe...:D
Bhag munna bhaaag...
Private Reply to Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion |
| Sep 15, 2005 12:34 pm | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Feroz Zaveri | | Point to be noted: only mistress doesn't have a mister in it! (What a geek I must seem like eh? Pointing out spelling mistakes! Wet blanket, party pooper?? yeah yeah!)
Musten: conversely, are you saying that HE doesn't have a.. in... to be.. Oh, forget it.. where is that delete button??
; ) Private Reply to Feroz Zaveri |
| Sep 15, 2005 1:03 pm | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion | | ya ya...conversely I was saying that HE needs S (AS*) for HE to be ......... oh god...when will I learn to do fill-in-the-blanks... :(
Private Reply to Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion |
| Sep 15, 2005 1:31 pm | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Tameem Qazi | | BRAVO! I'm impressed!!
You finally figured out the mystery :-)
But WAIT!... how come you missed out the very first word of your topic... 'GIRLS'!! Anyways.. since women cant really be complete without men ..so i guess they'd have to put up with mens' 'IRLS' too. Correct??
Ohh...you dont know what that is???? Let me enlighten you :)
IRLS means "Intellectually Retarded Losers Syndrome" !!
I'm such an angel..*Sigh* ;-)
Private Reply to Tameem Qazi |
| Sep 15, 2005 1:41 pm | | re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Tarun Theogaraj | | Ooops, looks like I stumbled into the kiddies section... :D Private Reply to Tarun Theogaraj |
| Sep 15, 2005 4:32 pm | | re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Nagarajan B | | Uh oh, no comments ... my wife is also on Ryze :)
Naga Private Reply to Nagarajan B |
| Sep 15, 2005 8:30 pm | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
carlton braganza | | you're a brave MAN pradeep Private Reply to carlton braganza |
| Sep 16, 2005 5:06 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Anupam Ketkar | | hahahahahhahaha
Best of luck, pradeep --- you are in too "deep"shit on this one. best of luck, man...feminists, hes all yours :)
Private Reply to Anupam Ketkar |
| Sep 16, 2005 5:17 am | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Pradeep Mehta | | Hi,
Thks for your support Carlton / Narajanan / Anupam.
Carlton meet you at Opus in the evening.
Byeeee
Regards,
PRadeep MEhtaPrivate Reply to Pradeep Mehta |
| Sep 16, 2005 5:30 am | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
simi reshma | | You know what?.........its the other way round...
WOMAN has MAN in it ........Man derived (or taken out) from Woman
SHE has HE in it........He from She
Mrs. has Mr. in it......Mr. from Mrs
LADY has LAD in it.........lad from Lady
MISTERESS has MISTER in it........Mister from Misteress
MADAM has ADAM in it.........Adam from madam
HOSTESS has HOST in it...........host from hostess
FEMALE has MALE in it ..........male from Female...
So finally without woman there is no man.........
Sad guys if there is no woman , there is no man.
Simi Private Reply to simi reshma |
| Sep 16, 2005 5:49 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
devan shah | | rt simi,
no man without woman,
and anyway wht will man do without woman!!!
not wrth living if thr r no woman!!
rgrds
devanPrivate Reply to devan shah |
| Sep 16, 2005 6:38 am | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Deepapriyadarshini | | Strangely...I am also on Wild Business Women...Tarun can I have the contact addresses of all the men who were on Pradeep's side... Private Reply to Deepapriyadarshini |
| Sep 16, 2005 7:44 am | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Rudy | | Interesting post on a business network!!! But anyway I shall have my voice heard!!! I shall stick to the naunces of english grammer only.
Most words mentioned here are derived either by adding suffixes or prefixes i.e MAN is the primary word, prefix it with WO , U get WOMAN. WO by itself conveys no meaning without a MAN.
similarly
HE, prefixed with S results in a SHE.
Mr. suffixed with s results in Mrs.
LAD suffixed with Y results in LADY.
Only a MISTER can have MISTERESS and not the other way around. Ever heard of a MISTERESS having a MISTER ?
The suffix here is ESS.
ADAM prefixed with M results in MADAM. Prefix is M.
HOST suffixed by ESS results in HOSTESS
MALE suffixed with FE results in FEMALE
Notice that these suffixes and prefixes have no meaning without the primary words. Primary words like MAN,HE,Mr., LAD, MISTER, ADAM, HOST, MALE convey a meaning , but do prefixes and suffixes like WO,S,Y,ESS,M,FE convey anything ?Private Reply to Rudy |
| Sep 16, 2005 7:54 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Madhu Menon | | "Misteress" is not a word. It's "mistress". Private Reply to Madhu Menon |
| Sep 16, 2005 8:12 am | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Rudy | | yeah dude, agreed. U havnt frgtten yr writing days yet :)) Private Reply to Rudy |
| Sep 16, 2005 8:42 am | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Ram Mulage | | Sudhee aka merlin has the point to say...well done! any takers?
ciao
-RamsPrivate Reply to Ram Mulage |
| Sep 16, 2005 8:55 am | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion | | Well done Merlin!
Deepa, I am on PraDeepa side :D
Private Reply to Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion |
| Sep 16, 2005 9:01 am | | re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Siddhartha Deb | | In this intense battle between genders, lemme admit very loud and clear, man is nothing without a girl:))
Oh c'mon guys!!! I dont think a world without girls would be even worth thinking about..let alone living in it..
:))
sid Private Reply to Siddhartha Deb |
| Sep 17, 2005 6:10 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Deepapriyadarshini | | Are u guys coming to the OPUS? Get a helmet with you Private Reply to Deepapriyadarshini |
| Sep 17, 2005 7:41 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Rudy | | oh lady , u r too late. The Opus stuff is over and our heads are intact Private Reply to Rudy |
| Sep 17, 2005 8:07 am | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Kartik Kumar | | Man, has it been a while since you got into an argument??? ....this is just begging to be pounced on by all the feminists out there. Although I'm not sure if they are that worried about the gays... Best of luck!! Private Reply to Kartik Kumar |
| Sep 17, 2005 11:11 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Groups | |
To add a serious note to all you mature people having this kiddy conversation :-
Today Women are no longer simple
---------------------------------
Enter, the TOMcatwoman are they SPECIES 4: the urban woman who comes to the megapolis to live out her mega dreams and ends up a mega misfit.
mutating female species in a mutating society where a woman can have it all, and no apologies to anyone.
"It is rightly said that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. History bears evidence that the female species has always been more deadly, vis-a-vis the male.
Not to forget, when it comes to matters of the heart, women are more emotional and can indulge in crimes of passion more easily than men
And YES this is crossing-over and assertion of aggression the flip side of female empowerment ... a rash spillover of the newfound independence.
for all who have yet to experience .. all the best.
Regards
Webee
Ref article : Times of India
Private Reply to Groups |
| Sep 17, 2005 11:23 am | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Sunil Mantri | | It seems to have ended witha Cofffe Tofffee fight..
nice to see... We cant always read official and business talks...
fights are always common between LADS and LADYs. Its like the SAANS-BAHU series.
Keep going... Private Reply to Sunil Mantri |
| Sep 17, 2005 2:16 pm | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Gopal Krishna - GK! | | My take is both Men and Women are incomplete without each other... I guess this is a safe bet to pacify both genders:)
GK! Private Reply to Gopal Krishna - GK! |
| Sep 19, 2005 5:52 am | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Deepapriyadarshini | | Yeah I was too late in posting that message...but i didnt realize it was too late...slept thru friday. why is that when I make a mistake everyone notices! Private Reply to Deepapriyadarshini |
| Oct 17, 2005 7:01 am | | re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Raghavendra BS | | Ya everyone needs to run a balanced life. there is no point in a man leading an excellent life, no worries, etc. there sould be balance between everything in life. joys vs worries, etc etc. no point in only enjoyment and no worries, life would be too dull. :)
RaghavendraPrivate Reply to Raghavendra BS |
| Oct 17, 2005 7:13 am | | re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
jesu maria sunitha | | It is good to be a woman:
We got off the Titanic first.
Taxis stop for us.
We don't look like a frog in a blender when dancing.
No fashion faux pas we make, could ever rival the Speedo.
If we forget to shave, no one has to know.
We can congratulate our teammate without ever touching her rear end.
We have the ability to dress ourselves.
If we marry someone 20 years younger, we are aware that we will look like an idiot.
We will never regret piercing our ears.
There are times when chocolate really can solve all your problems.
We can make comments about how silly men are in their presence because they aren't listening anyway.
Private Reply to jesu maria sunitha |
| Oct 17, 2005 7:31 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Search | | Thats a neet one suni, like a slit in the throat, guys who read the below message about woman do not agree - they have to go back to their CHILDHOOD and think of a person called MOTHER who is a she,woman,lady,mistress, etc......
YES this is how a WOMAN is made......Gentle yet so strong!!!!! Read through my friends.....it is so very true
A little boy asked his mother,
"Why are you crying?"
"Because I'm a woman", she told him.
"I don't understand," he said.
His mom just hugged him and said,
"And you never will".
Later the little boy asked his father,
"Why does mother seem to cry
for no reason?"
"All women cry for no reason"
was all his dad could say!!!
The little boy grew up and became a man,
still wondering why women cry.
Finally He put in a call to GOD; when
GOD got on the phone, the man asked,
"GOD, why do women cry so easily?"
GOD said, "When I made woman she
had to be special. I made her shoulders
strong enough to carry the weight of the
world; yet gentle enough to give comfort.
I gave her an 'inner strength' to endure
childbirth and the rejection that many
times comes from her children :-(
I gave her a 'hardness' that allows her to keep going when everyone else gives up and take care of her family through
sickness and fatigue without complaining.
I gave her 'sensitivity' to love her children
under any and all circumstances, even
when her child has hurt her badly.
This same sensitivity helps her make a child's
boo-boo feel better and share in her teenagers anxieties and fears.
I gave her 'strength' to carry her husband through his faults and fashioned her from his rib to protect his heart.
I gave her 'wisdom' to know that a good husband never hurts his wife, but sometimes test her strengths and her resolve to stand beside him unfalteringly
And finally, I gave her a 'tear' to shed.
This is hers exclusively to use whenever
it is needed."
"The beauty of a woman
is not in her clothes she wears, the figure that she carries, or the way she combs her hair. The beauty of a woman must be seen in her eyes, because that is the doorway to her heart, the place
where love resides."
Regrads
SofiaPrivate Reply to Search |
| Oct 17, 2005 8:28 am | | re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Ravi Sharma | |
Hi,
If you want to debate on this topic probably it would take a 1000 years for either men or women to win.
As a matter of fact, both women and men are totally diffent each other. God didn't created men or women to compete with each other rather complete each other that's why we have a wonderful system of marriage where two person totally different from each other spend their lives together. Can you imagine if husband start competing with wife and wife with husband ...what the hell life would become. I think the people who are married can appreciate this fact in a better way.
So folks agree to the fact that girls are nothing without men and so is men nothing with women.
Regards
Ravi
Private Reply to Ravi Sharma |
| Oct 17, 2005 8:54 am | | re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion | | Ravi, are you sure you are making this statement? Do you want to make any correction to this? Read it very very carefully again!
"So folks agree to the fact that girls are nothing without men and so is men nothing with women."
Nimz...where are you!!!
Private Reply to Musten Jiruwala Fading away into oblivion |
| Oct 17, 2005 9:21 am | | re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Ravi Sharma | | Hi Musten,
If you want to survive then my statement may be wrong but if you want to LIVE life then its correct
;)
Regards,
Ravi Private Reply to Ravi Sharma |
| Oct 17, 2005 10:26 am | | Girls are nothing without man | # |
Nirmala M Mohan | | Ohho! this HISteria is still going on??
Do men feel validated only with this play of words?
Why did God make men before women?
You need a rough draft before you have a final & a finer copy!
Private Reply to Nirmala M Mohan |
| Oct 17, 2005 11:26 am | | re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Malini Jain | | Men n Women , Girls n boys , No man is complete without women n women too without men .They are like railway tracks which are parallel . Their ego shouldn't meet if it happence train can not movie on the track .This is what i thought .
MaliniPrivate Reply to Malini Jain |
| Oct 17, 2005 11:58 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Gaurav Tekriwal | | Wah! Girls are a great topic for discussion and Male bonding! :)
Time Pass ho to aisa!
Translation: Time pass shud be like this only.
:)Private Reply to Gaurav Tekriwal |
| Oct 17, 2005 1:46 pm | | re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Sam .. | |
We got off the Titanic first.
(Had to get rid of the nagging so that men can die in peace.)
Taxis stop for us.
(Why just Taxi.. trucks, buses, bullock carts, Autos and all other means of transport will.. wouldnt want to miss the eye candy eh!!!)
We don't look like a frog in a blender when dancing.
(cant think of a better excuse to sit back and watch the moves.. Eye candy again.. )
No fashion faux pas we make, could ever rival the Speedo.
(With or without clothese.. Dont we love you anyways.. )
If we forget to shave, no one has to know.
(hmmm.. you have a point there. But I dont of any guy shaving any other part of his body other than his face)
We can congratulate our teammate without ever touching her rear end.
(Gee.. is that a new trend.. shaking hands was tradition till I realised the rear is available for shaking too)
We have the ability to dress ourselves.
(I know.. but what about undressing.. )
If we marry someone 20 years younger, we are aware that we will look like an idiot.
(na.. its not just about looking like an idiot.. we know she is an idiot.. else do you think we would venture.. )
We will never regret piercing our ears.
(I totally agree..)
There are times when chocolate really can solve all your problems.
(and add to the existing "weight" problems)
We can make comments about how silly men are in their presence because they aren't listening anyway.
(True.. Silly Men and silly women - great pair)
Private Reply to Sam .. |
| Oct 19, 2005 8:32 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Rashmi Tandon | | Bingo!!! n the arguments continue..... let's see who win! Private Reply to Rashmi Tandon |
| Oct 19, 2005 9:19 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Girls are nothing without man | # |
Deepak Shenoy | | Whoo! Another argument! Cool!
Okay, spanner in works. Men *do* shave other parts of their body.
http://movies.dcealumni.com/archives/salman-shaves-chest-to-impress-katrina-kaif/
Speedo was invented by a Gay Guy:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/Arts/Budgie-smugglers-Or-packed-lunch/2005/03/17/1110913734701.html
(point to note: Gay guys are not women, though some of them act that way)
Are gay men superior to lesbian women? I don't know. What about a "tingu" midget man vs. a sumo wrestler woman or Uma Bharti?
Why do Sumo Wrestlers shave their legs?
So you can tell them from feminists.Private Reply to Deepak Shenoy |
 |
|
|
